P. v. Garcia CA6
Defendant Saul David Garcia was convicted after jury trial of second degree robbery (Pen. Code, §§ 211, 212.5, subd. (c)), attempted carjacking (§§ 664, 215), felony false imprisonment (§§ 236, 237), and kidnapping during a carjacking (§ 209.5).
On appeal, he argues the court erred by requiring him to disclose undiscovered impeachment evidence in advance of using it for cross-examination. He also argues he was denied effective assistance of counsel throughout his trial, the court violated section 654 by not staying his sentence for second degree robbery, and the matter must be remanded for a hearing pursuant to People v. Franklin (2016) 63 Cal.4th 261 (Franklin).
Comments on P. v. Garcia CA6