In re Cyrus R. CA4/3
H.R. (father) appeals from the judgment terminating parental rights (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 366.26; all statutory citations are to this code) to his son Cyrus. He contends the juvenile court abused its discretion in denying his section 388 modification petition without an evidentiary hearing because he demonstrated a prima facie case of changed circumstances, and returning Cyrus to his physical custody or reinstating reunification services would be in Cyrus’s best interests. Mother, who did not receive reunification services, joins in father’s brief. (See Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.200 (a)(5); In re Mary G. (2007) 151 Cal.App.4th 184, 208.) We discern no abuse of discretion. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment.
Comments on In re Cyrus R. CA4/3