legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re S.L. CA4/2
Defendant and appellant J.C., hereafter referred to as father, appeals from an order terminating his parental rights to the minors S.L. and G.C. Throughout the dependency proceedings, father was incarcerated in a different county, awaiting trial for the murder of an unrelated infant, and was not allowed to attend the proceedings. He was, however, represented at all times by counsel. He contends that the juvenile court violated his federal constitutional due process rights and his state statutory right to be notified about juvenile court proceedings and to be produced to attend those proceedings. He contends that his exclusion from the jurisdiction/disposition hearing was prejudicial.
We conclude that father’s contentions with respect to his absence from the jurisdiction/disposition hearing are not cognizable in this appeal because he did not appeal from the disposition order.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale