P. v. Kay CA1/2
Defendant Christian J. Kay appeals following his conviction by a jury of two counts of assault and one count of shooting a BB device in a grossly negligent manner, all misdemeanors. He contends his statement to his school principal admitting he shot two students with an air rifle should have been excluded because he was not advised of his rights under Miranda v. Arizona (1966) 384 U.S. 436, 444 (Miranda) before the principal questioned him. He further contends that additional evidence should have been excluded because his subsequent statements to law enforcement were obtained in violation of Miranda and his consent to the search of his apartment was not voluntary.
We affirm.
Comments on P. v. Kay CA1/2