In re P.W. CA5
Appellant Daniel F. (father) appealed from the juvenile court’s orders denying his modification petition under Welfare and Institutions Code section 388 and selecting legal guardianship as the permanent plan (§ 366.26) for his now eight-year-old daughter, P.W. After reviewing the juvenile court record, father’s court-appointed counsel informed this court she could find no arguable issues to raise on father’s behalf. This court granted father leave to personally file a letter setting forth a good cause showing that an arguable issue of reversible error exists. (In re Phoenix H. (2009) 47 Cal.4th 835, 844 (Phoenix H.).)
Father filed a letter but failed to establish a good cause showing that an arguable issue of reversible error exists on the record. (Phoenix H., supra, 47 Cal.4th at p. 844.) Consequently, we dismiss the appeal.
Comments on In re P.W. CA5