In re S.J. CA1/2
The juvenile court removed two brothers from their mother’s custody, awarded sole custody to their previously noncustodial father and terminated dependency jurisdiction. Mother argues the court failed to properly assess whether the case required ongoing supervision. As we will explain, in light of the lack of evidence in the record concerning the father’s circumstances, the court’s failure to explain its decision to immediately terminate jurisdiction requires us to reverse and remand the matter for further proceedings.
Comments on In re S.J. CA1/2