legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Bardo CA6
A jury convicted defendant of two counts of sexual penetration of a child 10 years of age or younger (Pen. Code, § 288.7, subd. (b); counts 1 & 2) and one count of committing a forcible lewd or lascivious act on a child under the age of 14 years (§ 288, subd. (b)(1)). The trial court found true an allegation that defendant had a prior “strike” conviction (§§ 667, subds. (b)-(i), 1170.12) and sentenced defendant to an indeterminate prison term of 15 years to life, consecutive to an eight-year determinate term.
On appeal, defendant contends: (1) the trial court erred by giving a general intent instruction with respect to counts 1 and 2, because a violation of section 288.7, subdivision (b) is a specific intent crime; (2) the trial court erred by excluding evidence that the victim had previously been molested, evidence of how she had sexual knowledge, and evidence that she had made a prior false allegation of being molested.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale