legal news


Register | Forgot Password

V.C. v. Superior Court CA4/3
V.C. (Mother) is the mother of now nine-year-old R.M. and now eight year-old A.M. (collectively, the children). The children were taken into protective custody in January 2016. In September 2017, the juvenile court held an 18 month review hearing after which the court found that the return of the children to Mother would create a substantial risk of detriment to their safety, protection, or physical or emotional well-being within the meaning of section 366.22, subdivision (a)(1) of the Welfare and Institutions Code. The court terminated reunification services and set the matter for a permanency hearing under section 366.26. Mother filed a petition for a writ of mandate challenging the court’s order. She argued the juvenile court erred by finding that the return of the children to Mother would create a substantial risk of harm to the children. We deny the writ petition.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale