P. v. Tzeng CA1/5
Appellant Patrick Foo Tzeng appeals after a jury found him guilty of committing sexual offenses against a massage client. On appeal, he contends the trial court erred in denying his Batson/Wheeler motions during jury selection. (Batson v. Kentucky (1986) 476 U.S. 79 (Batson); People v. Wheeler (1978) 22 Cal.3d 258 (Wheeler).) He also contends the prosecutor committed misconduct during closing argument and insufficient evidence supports aspects of the trial court’s restitution award. We reverse and remand regarding one aspect of the restitution award, but otherwise reject appellant’s claims on appeal.
Comments on P. v. Tzeng CA1/5