P. v. Collins CA2/7
Chase Lee Collins and Robert Gerald Zygo were convicted following a jury trial of robbery and assault by means of force likely to produce great bodily injury. On appeal they argue the trial court committed prejudicial error when it excluded the preliminary hearing testimony of the victim, Lionel Ricard, which had been offered for impeachment purposes. Collins also argues the evidence is insufficient to support his conviction for robbery. We affirm.
Comments on P. v. Collins CA2/7