In re Nova S. CA2/2
The juvenile court asserted jurisdiction over a child born in 2015. The child’s father asserts that this was improper because the court did not comply with the requirements of the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA) (25 U.S.C. § 1901 et seq.). We conclude that the three errors father points out have either been cured or are irrelevant to the adequacy of the notice ICWA requires. Accordingly, we affirm.
Comments on In re Nova S. CA2/2