P. v. Brillon CA3
A jury found defendant Christopher Ruel Brillon guilty of stalking, making a criminal threat, and being a felon in possession of a firearm. In a bifurcated proceeding, the trial court found true the allegations he had a prior conviction for stalking and had served a prior prison term.
On appeal, defendant contends his conviction for making a criminal threat must be reversed because it is not supported by substantial evidence. He further contends his conviction for being a felon in possession of a firearm must be reversed because of improper venue. Anticipating that he may have forfeited his claims, defendant alternatively argues he received ineffective assistance of counsel. We affirm.
Comments on P. v. Brillon CA3