Flores v. Gonzalez CA6
The present appeal arises out of a dispute over the sale of real property. The trial court ruled that plaintiff Javier Flores could not recover equitable claims of specific performance and quiet title against defendants Amalia Gonzalez, Amalia Avila, and Jorge Oseguera Andrade. However, the trial court ruled that Flores could recover damages against Andrade for breach of contract and against Gonzalez and Avila for intentional interference with economic advantage. Gonzalez and Avila appeal from the judgment. They raise contentions relating to the sufficiency of the evidence, unjust enrichment, attorney’s fees, and damages. We find no error and affirm.
Comments on Flores v. Gonzalez CA6