legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Flores v. Gonzalez CA6
The present appeal arises out of a dispute over the sale of real property. The trial court ruled that plaintiff Javier Flores could not recover equitable claims of specific performance and quiet title against defendants Amalia Gonzalez, Amalia Avila, and Jorge Oseguera Andrade. However, the trial court ruled that Flores could recover damages against Andrade for breach of contract and against Gonzalez and Avila for intentional interference with economic advantage. Gonzalez and Avila appeal from the judgment. They raise contentions relating to the sufficiency of the evidence, unjust enrichment, attorney’s fees, and damages. We find no error and affirm.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale