legal news


Register | Forgot Password

R.J. v. Superior Court CA1/3
Petitioner R.J. (Father) is the natural father of A.J., born in April 2017. He challenges the juvenile court’s decision to deny him reunification services and to set a November 30, 2017 hearing, pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26, to consider a permanent plan for her. Father contends the juvenile court (1) abused its discretion when it denied him reunification services because it employed a standard that considered whether he and the child would benefit from those services, and (2) violated the Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978 (ICWA; 25 U.S.C. § 1901 et seq.) notice provisions. For the reasons stated, we deny the petition.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale