Kattuah v. Yuhl, Carr, LLP CA2/4
Plaintiff Lauren Kattuah appeals from a judgment in favor of a law firm, defendant Yuhl, Carr, LLP; a member of that firm, defendant James P. Carr; and an associate, defendant Tyler J. Barnett. The judgment followed an order granting defendants’ motion for summary judgment of plaintiff’s malpractice complaint. Plaintiff contends summary judgment was improper for two principal reasons: (1) defendants provided only inadmissible evidence in support of their motion for summary judgment; and (2) plaintiff provided an expert witness declaration that raised a triable issue of material fact as to whether defendants had satisfied their professional duty to preserve evidence. We find no basis for reversal, and affirm.
Comments on Kattuah v. Yuhl, Carr, LLP CA2/4