P. v. Velez CA2/6
David Michael Velez appeals a judgment following his conviction for possession of a firearm in violation of a probation order. (Pen. Code, § 29815, subd. (a)), a felony. We conclude, among other things, that 1) substantial evidence supports the judgment, 2) the trial court did not abuse its discretion by admitting evidence about Velez’s prior gun possession crime, 3) the trial court did not err by denying his request to reduce the conviction to a misdemeanor, and 4) Velez has not shown that one of his probation conditions is overbroad or unconstitutional. We affirm.
Comments on P. v. Velez CA2/6