Gunawardena v. Antracoli CA1/1
Plaintiff Dilip Gunawardena appeals from a defense judgment, entered after a jury trial, in a vehicle personal injury case. Plaintiff raises a single issue on appeal—that the trial court erred in admitting evidence of a videotaped deposition. We affirm.
On September 26, 2011, plaintiff and defendant John Antracoli were involved in a low speed, rear-end collision. Plaintiff’s car sustained minimal damage, and plaintiff initially said he had “just a few bruises, arms, legs. Nothing to write home about.” However, after he moved his car off the freeway and onto a parking lot, he claimed he “experienced this terrible, terrific, horrible, stab of neck pain,” when he turned his head to the right. He was taken by ambulance to Stanford Hospital and examined; X-rays showed no broken bones. Although his neck pain persisted, the last time plaintiff sought medical treatment for the injury was November 29, 2011.
Two years later, in September 2013, plaintiff sued defendant
Comments on Gunawardena v. Antracoli CA1/1