Elvin v. Elvin
Appellant appeals from an order entering judgment based upon settlement of an action between him and various parties, including his brother. The settlement agreement determined control of a trust created by Jon and Arthur’s mother. Appellant appeals from the trial court’s order entering judgment consistent with the settlement agreement, which among other things, replaces Arthur and appoints Jon as the successor trustee of the mother’s Trust. Appellant makes three contentions: 1) that he was denied due process because the trial judge coerced him into settling the dispute, 2) that he was denied due process because the trial court did not grant him a continuance to retain counsel, and 3) that appellant was denied an opportunity for a trial. We conclude that the settlement agreement was enforceable and that Appellant has failed to show any cognizable error. Court affirms the judgment.
Comments on Elvin v. Elvin