legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. McDaniel CA3
Appointed counsel for defendant Gunner Thomas Anthony McDaniel filed an opening brief that sets forth the facts of the case and asks this court to review the record to determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 (Wende).) Thereafter, defendant filed a supplemental brief. After reviewing defendant’s supplemental brief and the entire record, we have found no arguable error that would result in a disposition more favorable to defendant. However, we have found a sentencing error and a clerical error in the abstract of judgment that must be corrected. We will modify the judgment to correct the sentencing error and direct the trial court to prepare an amended abstract of judgment. We affirm the judgment as modified.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2026 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2026 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale