P. v. McCook CA4/2
Defendant Marquise Jamaal McCook appeals from his convictions for robbery, conspiracy to commit robbery, and possession of a firearm by a felon, contending: (1) his convictions were based on uncorroborated accomplice testimony; (2) the trial court prejudicially erred by permitting the prosecution to admit belatedly disclosed evidence; and (3) his trial attorney rendered ineffective assistance of counsel by failing to independently discover the undisclosed evidence earlier. We find no reversible error and, therefore, we affirm.
Comments on P. v. McCook CA4/2