In re Francisco N.
The court adjudged appellant, a ward of the court after it sustained allegations in a petition charging Defendant with possession of false instruments, being an unlicensed driver, and driving without proof of insurance. The court placed Defendant on probation. On appeal, defendant contends: 1) the evidence is insufficient to sustain the court’s true finding on the possession of the false instruments offense; and 2) the court erred in ordering him to pay all or part of the costs of drug testing as a condition of probation. Court found that the juvinile court did not impose the condition complained of and affirms the judgment.
Comments on In re Francisco N.