In re M.T. CA4/2
Defendant and appellant F.T. (mother) is the mother of the three children—C.R., a boy born in 1999; S.T., a girl born in 2000; and M.T., a girl born in 2012—who are the subjects of this dependency matter. Mother challenges the juvenile court’s orders, issued March 1, 2017, regarding her educational rights and visitation. More specifically, mother argues that the court applied the incorrect legal standard when it limited her educational rights with respect to the two older children, and she asserts that applying the correct standard there was no appropriate basis for the limitation. She also contends that the court’s visitation orders were not reasonable, because they provide that the two older children “will not be forced to visit.” Defendant and respondent San Bernardino County Children and Family Services (CFS) argues that mother waived or forfeited these arguments, and in any case the juvenile court did not err.
We find no prejudicial error, and affirm.
Comments on In re M.T. CA4/2