P. v. Soto CA2/2
Defendant and appellant Jesus Octavio Soto (defendant) appeals from the judgment entered after he was convicted of six acts of domestic violence. He contends that the trial court erred in admitting uncharged prior acts as foundational to expert testimony, by admitting certain expert testimony, and by imposing consecutive sentences as to four of the six counts. We find no merit to defendant’s contentions, and thus affirm the judgment.
Comments on P. v. Soto CA2/2