legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Wagner CA2/8
Appellant, James Wagner, contends that his admission to a prior conviction for auto theft or unlawful driving or taking of a vehicle pursuant to Penal Code section 666.5 must be vacated because the trial court failed to admonish him of his constitutional rights pursuant to Boykin v. Alabama (1969) 395 U.S. 238, 239 (Boykin) and In re Tahl (1969) 1 Cal.3d 122, 132. We agree, and therefore vacate the admission and remand the case for either (1) another admission after proper admonitions and waivers or (2) a jury or court trial on the truth of the allegation of the prior conviction.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2026 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2026 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale