Fuentes v. Callisto Group CA2/5
Plaintiff and appellant Rosemary Fuentes appeals from a judgment of dismissal following an order sustaining a demurrer without leave to amend in favor of defendant and respondent Callisto Group, Inc., doing business as Metro Lending Services, in this action arising from foreclosure proceedings. On appeal, Fuentes contends (1) the trial court abused its discretion by denying leave to amend the complaint, (2) the statements in recorded documents that Callisto was the lender were false, (3) her fraud causes of action are not barred by the statute of limitations, and (4) her loan documents should be cancelled because they are void. We conclude that the record on appeal is inadequate for review, because it lacks a reporter’s transcript of the hearing on the demurrer or a suitable substitute, such as a settled statement under California Rules of Court, rule 8.137.
Comments on Fuentes v. Callisto Group CA2/5