legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Cotton CA3
The only issue raised in this appeal is that the trial court incorrectly stated the amount of a restitution fine at sentencing ($280 instead of $240). The abstract of judgment shows the fine as $240; the parties agree that is the correct amount, and we agree with the parties.
Defendant Chase Cody Cotton asks this court to reduce the fine to $240. We shall do so. We also modify the sentence to reflect the correct method of calculating the sentence on subordinate terms. We affirm the judgment as so modified.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2026 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2026 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale