In re N.M. CA2/1
In this juvenile dependency case, defendant and appellant Jeremiah W. (Father) challenges the juvenile court’s order terminating his parental rights to his young daughter N.M. (Daughter). In particular, Father argues that, prior to termination of his parental rights, the Los Angeles County Department of Children and Family Services (Department) failed to comply with the juvenile court’s visitation plan for Father. As a result, Father claims he was unable to establish an exception to the termination of parental rights based on regular visitation. He claims his due process rights were violated. As discussed below, however, we conclude Father has waived his arguments on appeal. Therefore, we affirm.
Comments on In re N.M. CA2/1