In re Daniel M. CA2/3
L.M. (mother) and Hector F. (father) challenge the juvenile court’s exercise of jurisdiction over their infant son, Daniel M. On appeal, mother and father contend that substantial evidence did not support the juvenile court’s findings that mother’s mental and emotional problems, including depression and visual and auditory hallucinations, and father’s criminal conviction of continuous sexual abuse of a child, which was distant in time, placed Daniel at risk of physical harm and sexual abuse. We find that substantial evidence supported the juvenile court’s exercise of jurisdiction, and thus we affirm.
Comments on In re Daniel M. CA2/3