Furman v. City of Westminster CA4/3
This case arises out of disciplinary action taken by the City of Westminster (City) against a civilian police dispatch employee, Teresa Furman. After being terminated by the City for violation of three police department policies, Furman sought judicial review of the City’s findings and actions.
The trial court affirmed the City’s factual findings concerning policy violations, including a finding that Furman gave false or misleading statements during an internal affairs investigation, but held termination was a “grossly excessive” penalty.
The City appeals the latter determination, arguing the trial court erred in finding the City abused its discretion when it deemed termination appropriate. We agree. Because reasonable minds might, at best, differ as to the propriety of the penalty under the circumstances, we find no abuse of discretion and uphold the City’s actions.
Comments on Furman v. City of Westminster CA4/3