In re J.M. CA4/1
J.M.'s father, C.M. (Father), appeals from an order terminating his reunification services at a 12-month review hearing under Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.21. Father argues that the juvenile court abused its discretion in terminating his services where the court continued services to J.M.'s mother, J.J. (Mother), and did not set a hearing under section 366.26. Father contends that under these circumstances, the court's refusal to provide him further services was contrary to J.M.'s best interests. We affirm the order.
Comments on In re J.M. CA4/1