legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re A.W. CA4/2
J.P. (Mother) and D.W. (Father) appeal from the juvenile court’s orders finding the Indian Child Welfare Act (25 U.S.C. § 1901 et seq.) (ICWA) does not apply and terminating parental rights to their daughter, A.W. A.W. was three years old on the date of the permanent plan selection hearing, held on October 19, 2016, under Welfare & Institutions Code section 366.26. We affirm because: (1) Father was not an enrolled member of a Native American Tribe on the date of the hearing; (2) the court had already continued the hearing four times to accommodate Father’s efforts to enroll, and a further continuance was not in A.W.’s best interest; and (3) ICWA does not require a child welfare agency to facilitate a tribe’s internal membership proceedings.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale