P. v. Loeza
Defendant and appellant Valentino Vidal Loeza purports to appeal from the denial of his suppression motion (Pen. Code, § 1538.5). He also challenges the validity of his plea and admission following entry of judgment based on Loeza’s plea of no contest to possession of a firearm by a felon (§ 29800, subd. (a)(1); count 1) and possession of ammunition by a felon (§ 30305, subd. (a)(1); count 2) and, as to both counts, his admission to having suffered a prior felony conviction in Los Angeles Superior Court case number KA062618. The trial court suspended imposition of sentence and placed Loeza on formal probation for a three year period under certain terms and conditions, including that he serve 90 days in jail, CALTRANS, or Tree Farm, with 10 days custody credit; he was ordered not to drive a motor vehicle unless lawfully licensed and insured; and he was not to own, use or possess any dangerous or deadly weapons.
We conclude the appeal must be dismissed for lack of a certificate
Comments on P. v. Loeza