legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Loeza
Defendant and appellant Valentino Vidal Loeza purports to appeal from the denial of his suppression motion (Pen. Code, § 1538.5). He also challenges the validity of his plea and admission following entry of judgment based on Loeza’s plea of no contest to possession of a firearm by a felon (§ 29800, subd. (a)(1); count 1) and possession of ammunition by a felon (§ 30305, subd. (a)(1); count 2) and, as to both counts, his admission to having suffered a prior felony conviction in Los Angeles Superior Court case number KA062618. The trial court suspended imposition of sentence and placed Loeza on formal probation for a three year period under certain terms and conditions, including that he serve 90 days in jail, CALTRANS, or Tree Farm, with 10 days custody credit; he was ordered not to drive a motor vehicle unless lawfully licensed and insured; and he was not to own, use or possess any dangerous or deadly weapons.
We conclude the appeal must be dismissed for lack of a certificate

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale