P. v. Lemus
Appellant Miguel Angel Lemus was convicted of one count of attempted second degree robbery. On appeal, he challenges his conviction on the basis of insufficiency of the evidence, instructional error, and prosecutorial misconduct; additionally, he contends the minute order from the sentencing hearing and the abstract of judgment erroneously reflect the imposition of a $10 fine (Pen. Code, § 1202.5) and a related $29 assessment. We reject his contentions, with the exception of his challenge to the sentencing minute order and abstract of judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment, and direct the preparation of a corrected sentencing minute order and abstract of judgment.
Comments on P. v. Lemus