P. v. Khuri CA1/5
Appellant’s counsel has raised no issue on appeal and asks this court for an independent review of the record to determine whether there are any arguable issues. (Anders v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738; People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.) Counsel advised appellant of his right to file a supplemental brief (see People v. Kelly (2006) 40 Cal.4th 106), and appellant filed a timely brief contending that the trial court could not require him to waive custody credits while in a residential treatment facility, that his waiver was not made knowingly and intelligently, and the trial court abused its discretion in denying appellant’s Romero motion to strike a prior strike conviction. We affirm.
Comments on P. v. Khuri CA1/5