Sterling v. Stiviano CA2/3
Appellant V Stiviano received valuable gifts from the husband of respondent Rochelle Sterling. All of the gifts were derived from community property, and Ms. Sterling did not consent to any of them. Ms. Sterling sued Ms. Stiviano for return of the gifts. Relying on Family Code section 1100, subdivision (b), the trial court entered judgment in favor of Ms. Sterling, setting aside the gifts and ordering Ms. Stiviano to return the gifts or their value to Ms. Sterling on behalf of her marital community.
Ms. Stiviano appeals from the judgment, contending the trial court did not have authority to grant this relief. Her contentions have no merit, and we affirm the judgment.
Comments on Sterling v. Stiviano CA2/3