Bisno v. Levine CA2/5
Plaintiff and appellant Robert H. Bisno appeals from an order granting a motion to strike under Code of Civil Procedure section 425.16 (the anti-SLAPP statute). The anti-SLAPP motion was filed by defendants and respondents Barry Levine and Ari Schottenstein, who sought to strike specified causes of action from Bisno’s complaint.
Bisno is a licensed attorney who has mostly worked as a real estate developer and consultant. Bisno’s claims center around an alleged oral contract between Bisno and Ryan Ogulnick, under which Ogulnick promised to pay Bisno a percentage of profits from a real estate development project involving real property in Santa Ana (Property).
Comments on Bisno v. Levine CA2/5