Krant v. Hopper
Plaintiff appeal from judgment upon a jury's Special Verdict in the Los Angeles Superior Court in favor of Respondents because they claim respondent was negligent as a matter of law, the trial court's denial of a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict and its exclusion of evidence and reference to respondent's age and driving experience constituted prejudicial error, and respondent's memorandum of costs was not timely filed. Court affirms the judgment of the court in all regards.
Comments on Krant v. Hopper