Wells v. Dailey
A lawyer has repeatedly sued his former employee for alleged conversions of property. In the present litigation, the trial court awarded the lawyer money on a stock conversion claim that was not alleged in the complaint, over the relevancy objections of the former employee. Court reverses the award for the stock conversion. The trial court should not have admitted or considered testimony relating to stock conversion because it is not the subject of this litigation. Otherwise, court affirms the judgment.
Comments on Wells v. Dailey