P. v. Vargas CA4/3
Ernesto Vargas appeals from a judgment after a jury convicted him of two counts of grand theft, second degree commercial burglary, and forgery. Vargas argues the trial court erred by admitting photographic evidence and he should have been convicted of only one count of grand theft. Neither of his contentions have merit, and we affirm the judgment.
Comments on P. v. Vargas CA4/3