legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Ward CA6
A jury convicted defendant Alonzo Deval Ward of second degree robbery for pushing a man to the ground and taking his personal property. Defendant contends the trial court impeded his ability to present a misidentification defense by refusing to give a requested pinpoint instruction creating a presumption that a percipient witness not produced by the prosecution would have testified unfavorably to the prosecution. Because no evidence in the record indicates the prosecution knew of any percipient witnesses other than the two who testified at trial, we find no error in denying defendant’s request and will affirm the judgment.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale