P. v. Cordoza
Appellant's counsel filed a brief pursuant to People v. Wende, identifying no potentially arguable issues. Citing Anders v. California, appellant's counsel listed the following issues that might "arguably support" an appeal: "Did the court abuse its discretion in sentencing appellant to state prison? Did the court err in computing appellant's custody and conduct credits?"? Also, along with his notice of appeal, appellant filed a "summary of argument" purporting to support his contention he is entitled to 586 days of presentence custody credits, and to additional conduct credits under Penal Code section 2931 for the time he was in the "constructive custody" of the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation while serving his term for violating probation.
The judgment is affirmed.
Comments on P. v. Cordoza