legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Cordoza
Appellant's counsel filed a brief pursuant to People v. Wende, identifying no potentially arguable issues. Citing Anders v. California, appellant's counsel listed the following issues that might "arguably support" an appeal: "Did the court abuse its discretion in sentencing appellant to state prison? Did the court err in computing appellant's custody and conduct credits?"? Also, along with his notice of appeal, appellant filed a "summary of argument" purporting to support his contention he is entitled to 586 days of presentence custody credits, and to additional conduct credits under Penal Code section 2931 for the time he was in the "constructive custody" of the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation while serving his term for violating probation. The judgment is affirmed.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale