P. v. Hauge CA3
Appointed counsel for defendant Colin Christopher Hauge asked this court to review the record to determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 (Wende).) Having reviewed the record, we discovered errors in the abstract of judgment involving the probation revocation fine, restitution fine, and parole revocation fine. We shall correct the abstract of judgment to conform to the oral pronouncement of judgment. In all other respects, the judgment is affirmed.
Comments on P. v. Hauge CA3