legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re M.R. CA2/8
Father appeals the juvenile court’s jurisdictional findings and dispositional order removing his then-eight-year-old daughter and then-three-year-old son from his custody and placing the children in foster care. Father argues that he posed no present threat of harm to the children, and that his drug abuse and domestic violence were too remote in time to support jurisdiction. Father contends the court erred in not placing the children with his suggested non-relative extended family member for placement. Father filed a separate appeal from an order issued at the six-month review hearing, arguing that the Department of Children and Family Services (DCFS) unjustifiably failed to evaluate his proposed caretaker for the children. We consolidated the two appeals and now affirm the juvenile court’s orders.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale