legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Moorpark v. Boodaie CA2/2
Appellant Joseph Boodaie (Boodaie) appeals from a postjudgment order ruling he is the owner of Osher and Osher, Inc. (Osher), and that respondents 26 Moorpark, LLC (Moorpark) and Kourosh Vosoghi (Vosoghi) (Respondents) have the right to levy on Osher’s stock certificates as his personal property. Boodaie was self-represented at the postjudgment hearing and remains so on appeal. His opening brief lacks a coherent factual statement, mandatory citations to the trial court record, and applicable legal arguments and authority. He also fails to provide an adequate record, omitting documents relevant to his contentions. We affirm the postjudgment order.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale