In re M.D. CA1/4
M.D. appeals from a disposition order declaring her a ward of the juvenile court and placing her on probation in an ACT program. M.D.’s sole contention is that her probation conditions are unconstitutionally vague because they do not contain express “knowledge” requirements. This claim fails in light of our Supreme Court’s recent decision in People v. Hall (2017) 2 Cal.5th 494 (Hall).
Comments on In re M.D. CA1/4