legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Tallo CA1/3
Peter Lad Tallo (appellant) appeals from a judgment entered after a jury convicted him of receipt of a stolen vehicle (Pen. Code, § 496d, subd. (a) ) and misdemeanor possession of burglar tools (§ 466). The trial court found true an alleged prior strike (§§ 667, subds. (b)-(i), 1170.12, subds. (a)-(d)) and an alleged prior prison term commitment (§ 667.5, subd. (b)) and sentenced him to six years in state prison. Appellant contends the judgment must be reversed because he was provided with ineffective assistance of counsel. We reject the contention and affirm the judgment.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale