In re I.M. CA2/1
Y.D. (mother) appeals from the juvenile court’s jurisdictional and dispositional orders regarding her infant daughter, I.M. (child), who was born in January 2016. Mother’s challenge to the court’s dispositional order is by implication only—that is, her principal challenge is to the jurisdictional finding, arguing that because jurisdiction was inappropriate, the dispositional order necessarily fails. With regard to the court’s exercise of jurisdiction, mother claims that it was not supported by substantial evidence. We disagree and, accordingly, affirm.
Comments on In re I.M. CA2/1