P. v. Looney CA3
A jury found defendant Emanuel Lee Looney guilty of first and second degree robbery, unlawful driving and taking of a vehicle, and fleeing a pursuing patrol vehicle. The jury also found defendant’s prior conviction and serious felony allegations to be true. On appeal, defendant contends that: (1) the trial court’s denial of the motion to sever was error and resulted in prejudice; (2) there was insufficient evidence to support a conviction for robbery of Pardeep Kumar; and (3) he was deprived of his rights to due process and a jury trial when the jury was instructed that it had already been determined he was the person who had the alleged prior convictions. Finding no merit in these contentions, we affirm.
Comments on P. v. Looney CA3