In re S.F. CA4/2
Appellant S.F. (father) appeals the order terminating parental rights as to his son, S.F. (the child). On appeal, father argues that the order must be reversed because (1) he did not receive adequate notice of the Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26 hearing, and (2) the Riverside County Department of Social Services (DPSS) and the juvenile court failed to comply with the inquiry and notice provisions of the Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978 (ICWA) (25 U.S.C. § 1901 et seq.). We affirm.
Comments on In re S.F. CA4/2