P. v. Sullivan CA1/1
Following a jury trial, defendant was convicted of residential burglary and grand theft. He contends the trial court committed prejudicial error when it instructed the jury with CALCRIM No. 371 that it could consider an accomplice’s attempted suppression of evidence as a circumstance tending to show defendant’s consciousness of guilt. Defendant also contends the abstract of judgment should be modified to accurately reflect the sentence imposed. We conclude the trial court properly instructed the jury, but the abstract of judgment must be modified to indicate the sentence actually imposed by the trial court.
Comments on P. v. Sullivan CA1/1